Fun with Touchstone Numbers

Disclaimer: This is not investment advice, nor is it a recommendation to buy or sell shares in the company/companies mentioned.

Read Full Disclaimer

The information contained herein is accurate to the best of the author’s knowledge, but the material and interpretations contained herein should be independently verified by any party using this information as part of any research, editorial, or decision making process. Any views expressed here represent the author’s opinion only, and as such readers should do their own research and come to their own conclusions if they are using the opinions contained herein as part of any larger due diligence process. The author may have long or short positions in the companies mentioned and may be buying or selling in the market depending on which way the wind is blowing at any given moment. Opinions are subject to change without notice. Prospective resources, predictions, comparisons, financial projections, and extrapolated metrics are, by their nature, subjective and interpretation dependent. The topics covered are highly speculative and involve a high degree of uncertainty and risk. Speculative companies can and do go to zero. By using this site, you agree that the author(s) and Hydra Capital is/are not responsible for any damages incurred by the use of the presented materials. Anyone reading these blog posts should know that they are the author’s thoughts and opinions, which are not to be confused with or construed as research reports.

Disclosure: The following represents my opinions only. I am not receiving any compensation for writing this article, nor does Hydra Capital have any business relationship with companies mentioned in this post. I am long TXP.TO

With nothing but time on my hands these days, I’ve had a lot of time to think about a lot of stories; some new, some old. I got to Touchstone Exploration last night (TXP.TO, TXP.L, last at C$0.55) and realized that I really hadn’t appreciated just how asymmetric the risk-reward has become, based on some fairly simple math.

Here’s the punchline in one image that shows the impact to my view of value based on a range of outcomes for Chinook and Cascadura Deep, which I expect will be the next two wells into TXP’s Ortoire block. What follows below just explains the rationale. All numbers in my scenario analysis table would reflect gas volumes net to TXP’s net interest:

My math journey starts with Aventura in 2004, when it was bought by BG Group for C$228 million. Aventura had a similar discovery onshore Trinidad to what Touchstone has drilled at Cascadura (just to the west of TXP’s lands) and it had the well on long-term production test when BG made its bid. Digging through past filings, Aventura’s net 2P reserves at the time were 300 BCF, meaning that BG paid C$0.76/mcf for the 2P reserves. The natural gas price in Trinidad at the time was US$1.10/mcf and the CAD/US fx rates were similar to what they are today so I’m not going to worry about forex changes.